Out Front Magazine Article Rating

If the Supreme Court Overturns 'Roe,' Could Marriage Equality Be Next?

May 05, 2022 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    -60% Very Liberal

  • Reliability

    N/AN/A

  • Policy Leaning

    70% Very Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    -13% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

54% : Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey are considered crucial to the history of abortion rights in the United States, with the former establishing the right to abortion as a fundamental right and the latter reaffirming that right with some restrictions in 1992.
41% : Alito also claims that abortion was "entirely unknown in American law ... until the latter part of the 20th century," which could also apply to other fundamental rights that are newly established, including marriage equality.
41% : Though, the judge also states the same reasoning -- that abortion does not deserve constitutional protection because it is not rooted in the country's traditions and Constitution -- does not apply to other recently recognized rights.
40% : Now, a question arises surrounding if other fundamental rights, including marriage equality, could be threatened next, using similar reasoning that opponents of Roe used in the Supreme Court case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
33% : Alito writes that the cases must be overturned in the document obtained by Politico, given that the Constitution "makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision."
31% : In his Twitter thread, Stern mentions that Alito's draft opinion explicitly criticizes both cases similarly to abortion, saying, "None of these rights has any claim to being deeply rooted in history."

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link