
Kentucky Pro-Life Groups Hope to Avoid a Kansas Repeat
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
98% Very Right
- Politician Portrayal
24% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
46% : The proposed amendment is a proactive defense of the state's abortion bans against legal challenges currently pending against them, which have been brought by a coalition of progressive groups including Planned Parenthood and the American Civil Liberties Union.45% : The plaintiffs won two early victories when a circuit court issued a restraining order against enforcement of the abortion bans on June 30 and a temporary injunction on July 28.
44% : Other proposed amendments -- on the ballot this year in deep-blue states like California -- would enshrine the right to abortion in their state constitutions as proactive attempts to ensure their already pro-choice laws can't be overturned later.
43% : The Bluegrass State is one of the most restrictive in the nation on abortion, passing several overlapping bills in recent years to limit abortion rights.
42% : Kentucky's proposal, by only stating that a right to abortion doesn't implicitly exist in the constitution, wouldn't prevent a Democratic legislature from moving later to liberalize the state's abortion regime.
41% : That's because a 2019 "trigger law" outright abolished the procedure, save for exceptions to protect a mother from death or serious injury, in the event that the court allowed states to regulate abortion again.
38% : The Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health decision in June punted the regulation of abortion back to the states, whose political processes can get pretty messy.
37% : "Most people -- regardless of their political affiliation -- do not believe that people should not be able to access abortion under no circumstance," said Jackie McGranahan, a policy strategist for ACLU of Kentucky.
36% : "To protect human life," the amendment says, "nothing in this Constitution shall be construed to secure or protect a right to abortion or require the funding of abortion."
34% : It may seem a strange strategic choice in a state where abortion is already illegal.
27% : There's recent reason for pro-lifers to be apprehensive about putting abortion directly on the ballot: In Republican Kansas, voters last month roundly rejected a measure that would have amended the state constitution to allow the legislature to regulate abortion.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.