EDGE Media Network Article Rating

Marriage Equality Icon Jim Obergefell Reacts to Leaked Supreme Court Opinion with Worry for Marriage Equality | EDGE Media Network

May 05, 2022 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    50% Medium Conservative

  • Reliability

    N/AN/A

  • Policy Leaning

    64% Medium Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    23% Positive

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

48% : Obergefell, who was the lead plaintiff in Obergefell v. Hodges, the case that led to the Court's 2015 ruling that made marriage equality legal in every state of the union, took to Twitter to express his alarm that "Our most basic human rights are under siege" by the Court, which currently has a conservative majority, queer perspective pop culture/news site "them" detailed.
47% : "I'm also concerned that members of this extreme court are eager to turn their attention to overturning marriage equality," Obergefell posted.
46% : Marriage equality advocate and candidate for the Ohio state legislature Jim Obergefell has spoken out about the leaked draft of a Supreme Court opinion that calls women's reproductive freedoms and LGBTQ+ rights into question, Cleveland.com reported.
44% : As previosuly reported, Alito's opinion, in its current draft form, overturns the Court's own 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade, the case that made abortion legal in America.
44% : Alito slammed those rulings for their "attempts to justify abortion through appeals to a broader right to autonomy and to define one's 'concept of existence'" before adding: "None of these rights has any claim to being deeply rooted in history."
42% : Envisioning a subsequent case in which the Court could use the same arguments to revoke marriage equality from gay and lesbian American families, Obergefell said, "The sad part is in both these cases, five or six people will determine the law of the land and go against the vast majority of Ohioans and Americans who overwhelmingly support a woman's right to make her own health decisions and a couple's right to be married."
41% :"The plaintiffs successfully argued that depriving same-sex couples of the right to marriage violated the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause under the 14th Amendment; the rest is quite literally history," them added.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link