Enforce 22 USC 1928f: Save NATO, Contain Trump Foreign Policy

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

49% : They bequeathed on succeeding generations gifts of inestimable value, which included: the Nuremberg and Tokyo War Crimes Tribunals, the foundation of modern international criminal law; the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which has been instrumental in protecting and advancing human dignity worldwide; the United Nations and its myriad specialized agencies which, although not perfect, have yielded enormous benefits; numerous institutions and systems dedicated to economic and trade cooperation, all designed to increase prosperity and lessen the sources of potential conflict; and, not least, NATO, which has helped keep the peace in Europe for more than 75 years.
46% : Next, I will turn to each of the treaty provisions at issue.First, Article 1, which reads in its entirety: The Parties undertake, as set forth in the Charter of the United Nations, to settle any international dispute in which they may be involved by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security and justice are not endangered, and to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.
38% : 2(4) of the UN Charter leaves no doubt that territorial conquest through the threat or use of force is flatly prohibited, as confirmed by the International Court of Justice, the UN General Assembly, the U.S. DoD's own Law of War Manual, and decades of state practice. b) The North Atlantic Treaty Trump's threats materially breached or triggered several provisions of the Treaty.
36% : By threatening Greenland with the use of force, Trump breached Article 2(4), one of its central provisions, which reads: All members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, on in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.