'Human filth': James Packer absolutely unloads on former Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
40% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
20% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
-58% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-22% Negative
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
49% : It included a provision in Crown Casino's license stating that if the government changed the tax rates it would have to pay compensation for the company's reduction in profit.49% : "With three weeks to go (on the sale) f---ing Daniel Andrews changes the tax rates on Crown and rips 50 million... out of Crown and gives no compensation," Mr Packer said.
42% : Mr Packer said the damage Mr Andrews had done to Victoria's balance sheet would be "impossible to fix", and attacked the former Labor leader for backflipping on planned tax changes just weeks before his sale of Crown Resorts was set to go through.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
