Lebanon becomes political crisis for Netanyahu | The National

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

55% : Mr Netanyahu lauded the capture, saying Israel had returned to the area "united, determined and stronger than ever".
53% : Israel's expanding campaign in Lebanon was becoming the subject of concern even before Mr Trump's latest intervention.
51% : We will restore security to the citizens of Israel.
47% : " Another leading opposition candidate, Yair Lapid, said Israel had become a "full-fledged protectorate state" of the US.
47% : It represents Israel's long and costly presence in Lebanon, something that claimed too many soldiers' lives and ended without Israel achieving its strategic goals.
42% : He said Israel had refrained from powerful strikes on Beirut, apart from some targeted killings, because of "US contacts regarding an agreement with Iran".
38% : "The real questions are different: how does Israel eventually leave?
34% : Thank you Bibi!" Iran had earlier said Israel's expanding attacks on Lebanon were jeopardising peace talks.
34% : Mr Katz also said there "is no ceasefire in Lebanon" and lauded the displacement of what he claimed to be 600,000 of Dahieh's 950,000 population, after Israel said it would bomb the area.
26% : Mr Trump's intervention has raised fears of Israel losing sovereign control of its military actions.
14% : Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faced fierce accusations of botching Israel's military campaign in Lebanon from across the political spectrum, after US President Donald Trump appeared to veto further fighting.
13% : Defence Minister Israel Katz said Mr Trump had adopted a "principle" set out by him and Mr Netanyahu that would give Israel permission to bomb Beirut's Dahieh suburbs, regarded by Israel as a Hezbollah stronghold, if the group fired on northern Israeli communities.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.