Mamdani's win has progressives eyeing New York City House seats
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
100% ReliableExcellent
- Policy Leaning
16% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
-32% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
56% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
53% : Creative & Crisis, who is working with candidate Cameron Kasky, who hopes to succeed Nadler. 2024 Election Coverage Even if some of the socialist and progressive candidates fail to recreate Mamdani's electoral success, the pipeline for future challengers is also expanding.49% : "We're seeing that Zohran really picked up a lot of areas that many would say underperformed in the primaries," said Sebastian Leon Martinez, coordinator of the Democratic Socialists of America's (DSA) New York City chapter's youth branch.
34% : "Mamdani's win absolutely has energized and put a set of excitement for not only socialists and left-leaning people or progressives, but anybody that is desirous of a change," said Andre Easton, a Party of Socialism and Liberation member who launched a campaign against Torres.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
The Hill