South Africa Today Article RatingSAHRC Finds Racial and Gender Discrimination in Hartbeespoort Dam Land Allocation - South Africa Today
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
40% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-28% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
63% : "Indeed, the South African Human Rights Commission received a complaint relating to unfair discrimination on the ground of race when it comes to accessing state land along the shorelines of Hartbeespoort Dam," Mlombo stated.60% : An official investigation has found evidence of unfair racial and gender discrimination in the allocation of state land leases along the shorelines of the Hartbeespoort Dam, the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) confirmed today.
59% : "In the commission's investigation, we found that indeed there was evidence of unfair discrimination on the ground of race and gender.
59% : " Mlombo explained that this discrimination stemmed from the failure of the Department of Water and Sanitation to fulfill its constitutional duty to promote equality and ensure equitable access to resources.
41% : These failures included not enacting or enforcing relevant bylaws concerning development, building regulations, and noise pollution.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
