Texas abortion pill ruling partly blocked by appeals court
View Original Article-34% Moderately Liberal
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
-46% Moderately Liberal
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
36% Negative
N/A
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Reliability Score Analysis
The Reliability Score of the article is determined on a percentage score basis from 0 to 100%.
- Opposite Sources as Poor for the lower number of sources with different viewpoints.
- Unique Sources as Poor for the lower number of different sources.
- Multiple Sources as Fair for an average number of total sources.
- Multiple Quotes as Excellent for a very high number of quotes used in the article.
- Quote Length as Good for a higher number of words used in each quote.
Opposite Sources: 0% Poor (Grade F) Unique Sources: 25% Poor (Grade E) Multiple Sources: 50% Fair (Grade C) Multiple Quotes: 100% Excellent (Grade A) Quote Length: 75% Good (Grade B)
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Policy Leaning Analysis
This article includes the following sentiments, providing an average bias score of -46% Liberal:
- 2 positive sentiments for Abortion
"In his ruling, Judge Kacsmaryk used language pulled directly from anti-abortion activists, including referring to abortion providers as "abortionists", abortion patients as "post-abortive women," and a fetus as an "unborn human"."
"In November, a group of anti-abortion activists filed a lawsuit against the FDA's approval of mifepristone and the way the agency has changed the rules around its use, making it easier to obtain."
Politician Portrayal Analysis:
This article includes the following Politician Portrayal sentiments, providing an average sentiment of 36% Negative and bias score of 10% Conservative:
1 negative sentiment for Joe Biden
"The judge's ruling had been set to take effect in seven days - on 14 April - unless the appeals court intervened, prompting protests from the nation's leading abortion rights advocacy groups and the appeal brought by the Biden administration."
This is a negative sentiment.
"The appeals court panel - made up of George W Bush nominee Judge Catharina Haynes and two Donald Trump nominees Kurt Engelhardt and Andrew Oldham - said that, while it was reinstating the approval of the drug, the DOJ has not shown they are likely to succeed in fighting against the challenge to the rule changes."
This is a negative sentiment.
Policies:
AbortionPoliticians:
Donald TrumpJoe Biden
Sentiments
- Liberal
22% "In November, a group of anti-abortion activists filed a lawsuit against the FDA's approval of mifepristone and the way the agency has changed the ..."
-14% The appeals court panel - made up of George W Bush nominee Judge Catharina Haynes and two Donald Trump nominees Kurt Engelhardt and Andrew ..."
-22% The judge's ruling had been set to take effect in seven days - on 14 April - unless the appeals court intervened, prompting protests ..."
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
63% : In his ruling, Judge Kacsmaryk used language pulled directly from anti-abortion activists, including referring to abortion providers as "abortionists", abortion patients as "post-abortive women," and a fetus as an "unborn human".61% : In November, a group of anti-abortion activists filed a lawsuit against the FDA's approval of mifepristone and the way the agency has changed the rules around its use, making it easier to obtain.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.