
The Supreme Court is about to stop Alvin Bragg dead in his tracks - Renewed Right
- Bias Rating
82% Very Conservative
- Reliability
30% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
98% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-34% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-25% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
61% : "President Trump respectfully submits that an adjournment of the trial is appropriate to await further guidance from the Supreme Court, which should facilitate the appropriate application of the presidential immunity doctrine in this case to the evidence the People intend to offer at trial," Trump's attorneys wrote.55% : Bragg indicted Trump on a fantastical legal theory that Trump falsified business records to cover up a federal campaign finance crime by repaying Michael Cohen the $130,000 Cohen paid Stormy Daniels in October 16 as part of a nondisclosure agreement settlement.
35% : But not even the Biden DOJ dared bring such a charge as it was obvious to all that Trump committed no such crime as federal election law allows candidates to do virtually anything they want with their own money.
28% : No one - not even liberal legal analysts - view this as a serious case as Bragg stitched together a clearly political indictment that wouldn't have been filed against anyone else other than Donald Trump.
25% : Bragg indicted Trump for covering up a crime that didn't exist and that he doesn't have jurisdiction over because falsifying business records is a misdemeanor and the statute of limitations long ago expired.
23% : Now Trump's argued he's immune from criminal prosecution due to Presidential immunity.
20% : Alvin Bragg is set to be the first Democrat to force Donald Trump to face criminal charges when the rigged show trial Bragg brought is set to begin on March 25.
20% : However, Bragg's indictment accused Trump of allegedly falsifying these business records while he was President.
14% : Alvin Bragg thought he had a slam dunk criminal case against Donald Trump.
9% : In the January 6 case, Obama Judge Tanya Chutkan ordered the trial to begin a mere seven months after Jack Smith indicted Trump on legally dubious charges.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.