
U.S. Supreme Court curbs federal power to regulate greenhouse gases, in blow to Biden | NC Policy Watch
- Bias Rating
12% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-2% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-35% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
55% : Of all regions of the country, the South has the most to lose from unchecked climate change, and the most to gain from an economy that relies on clean energy.53% : "In so doing, it deprives EPA of the power needed -- and the power granted -- to curb the emission of greenhouse gases."
52% : In response to the Supreme Court's announcement, Frank Rambo, senior attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center and leader of the organization's Clean Energy and Air Program, issued a statement:By hobbling the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate carbon emissions, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling today has gravely hamstrung the United States' progress to taking swift and necessary action to address climate change.
47% : Duke's proposed decarbonization plan would gradually reduce the use of coal, but also ramps up natural gas, a major source of another greenhouse gas, methane.
42% : The Court's ruling in favor of coal companies in a case about an environmental safeguard that no longer exists -- indeed, one that never took effect -- dismisses legal precedent, and ignores the climate crisis that is already hurting families and communities in the South.
41% : The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday the Environmental Protection Agency does not have the authority to regulate greenhouse gases as pollutants, siding with a group of Republican attorneys general and coal companies in a major blow to the executive branch's power to curb climate change.
41% : The decision, issued on the last day of the court's term, capped a landmark term for its new conservative majority that issued major rulings revoking a constitutional right to abortion, limiting states' power to regulate guns and restricting federal COVID-19 regulations.
36% : In a dissent written by Justice Elena Kagan, the court's three liberals said the decision strips the executive branch agency charged with environmental regulation of its power to respond to the most urgent environmental issue the world faces.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.