Previous Troubling Reports

There are several reason this article is inaccurate and misleading. For one the author makes the argument that AOC is misusing the word genocide, while herself never identifying it... There are several reason this article is inaccurate and misleading. For one the author makes the argument that AOC is misusing the word genocide, while herself never identifying it. Second She refers to the War in Ukraine as a genocide, when it has not been classified as such. Third the author never quote AOC or describe specifically what context AOC uses the word genocide. these three observations about the article demonstrate the lack of quality and clarity the author brings fourth, and is therefore very likely to be misleading. The author also uses fake facts to prove her argument More

The author cites an extremely right-wing biased news source as evidence of the so-called conspiracy plot to keep Donald Trump from winning the presidency in November. The article c... The author cites an extremely right-wing biased news source as evidence of the so-called conspiracy plot to keep Donald Trump from winning the presidency in November. The article contains rhetoric that harshly criticizes Republicans who don't agree with everything on the presumptive GOP nominee such as "RINO Republicans." It similarly portrays Democrats negatively and on the side of the conspiracy. More

I dislike the structure of this article, framing the news in a divisive manner for such a small occurance. The one-worded quotes, again, are unprofessional,

I dislike the structure of this article, framing the news in a divisive manner for such a small occurance. The one-worded quotes, again, are unprofessional,

I dislike the structure of this article, framing the news in a divisive manner for such a small occurance. The one-worded quotes, again, are unprofessional,

I dislike the structure of this article, framing the news in a divisive manner for such a small occurance. The one-worded quotes, again, are unprofessional,

I dislike the structure of this article, framing the news in a divisive manner for such a small occurance. The one-worded quotes, again, are unprofessional,

I dislike the structure of this article, framing the news in a divisive manner for such a small occurance. The one-worded quotes, again, are unprofessional,

The article is entirely composed of statements that Trump himself made, which are completely opinionated and have no factual backing.

While reading this article, it is clear that the author is against Biden and the Democratic Party. It continuously accuses them of stealing the 2020 election from Trump. It further... While reading this article, it is clear that the author is against Biden and the Democratic Party. It continuously accuses them of stealing the 2020 election from Trump. It further goes on to discuss how the Democrats will steal the election in 2024 as well. It accuses, without providing evidence to back up the claims, that cities like Atlanta, Milwaukee, and Detroit helped to ensure Trump's defeat in the swing states. The article further goes into a huge conspiracy about COVID, Mark Zuckerberg, and various other organizations and individuals helping the Biden campaign. This article is provides no factual information to back up their claims. It repeatedly makes assertions that they are unable to back up. It is a story that was clearly written to slander Biden and the Democratic Party. The author wants Republicans to believe that the election was stolen from them. More

While reading the article, I noticed that there was a lot of quotations and favor of Biden’s stance. It is good to note that there were quotes describing the event on both sides ... While reading the article, I noticed that there was a lot of quotations and favor of Biden’s stance. It is good to note that there were quotes describing the event on both sides how President Biden, and the Prime Minister of Israel felt about the plans to come. However there were more quotes that were against the plan by Israel’s Prime Minister can be a sign of biased that the author is showing in terms of how they feel about the situation. More

This article exhibits a clear Republican bias, as it focuses heavily on the suspect's immigration status to support the argument that immigrants are inherently prone to criminal be... This article exhibits a clear Republican bias, as it focuses heavily on the suspect's immigration status to support the argument that immigrants are inherently prone to criminal behavior. Rather than providing a balanced view of the case, the article emphasizes the suspect's illegal immigration status. This emphasis on immigration status serves to perpetuate stereotypes and fears about immigrants, aligning with the Republican narrative that stricter immigration policies are necessary for public safety. By framing the narrative in this way, the article reinforces the Republican agenda of prioritizing immigration enforcement over other factors contributing to crime. Overall, the article's Republican bias is evident in its selective reporting and framing of the narrative to support a particular political perspective. More