Previous Troubling Reports

This article does a mediocre job at laying out the arguments placed before the Supreme Court. It is clear from the very beginning that the author is against Trump. The article repe... This article does a mediocre job at laying out the arguments placed before the Supreme Court. It is clear from the very beginning that the author is against Trump. The article repeatedly attacks Trump's lawyer and writes how he is over his head and unprepared. It discusses how the justices ripped him apart. The article rebukes the arguments made by Mitchell; however, puts in minimal effort to analyze Colorado's lawyers. They describe Trump's arguments as absurd and silly. The whole text has a negative tone towards Trump and his ability to stay on the ballot. More

Even the title suggests the article would be very anti-Trump biased, further escalating in the article - sentences and phrases such as "Trump’s habitual refusal to accept the ru... Even the title suggests the article would be very anti-Trump biased, further escalating in the article - sentences and phrases such as "Trump’s habitual refusal to accept the rules and results of elections" or "four-times criminally indicted Trump" shout it out loud. There are a lot of such passages to talk about but I would like to point out the ending of the article "Trump’s response will be filtered through his highly developed sense of injustice and suspicion of institutions of accountability and his often self-serving interpretation of the law." The author of the article here refers to the history. It might have happened but there is no specific reference attached. That is misleading. And how can the author predict the future? It is ok to mention one's ideas in an opinion based article but this one is not presented as one of those so some readers might take these sentences as facts which might be dangerous. The bias in this article is simply too obvious. As a reporter, the writer should always try to avoid personal opinions leaking in an article and leave some space for the reader to make his or her own opinion. But here, there is too much pressure to accept whatever the author thinks. More

This piece is primarily subjective and negatively speak about several Republican officials, such as Donald Trump and Vivek Ramaswamy. The combined compliments and criticisms for Ni... This piece is primarily subjective and negatively speak about several Republican officials, such as Donald Trump and Vivek Ramaswamy. The combined compliments and criticisms for Nikki Haley leave an ambiguous message as to what the author really believes about the presidential candidate. It also discredits the reliability of the information, as readers are encouraged to make decisions based on opinion rather than hard facts. The diction is indicative of the author attempting to inspire certain emotions and presuppositions within the readers. More

I found this article troubling because it asserts that Mexico is the source of the fentanyl crisis. But after a few quick searches, it was easy to discover that most fentanyl comes... I found this article troubling because it asserts that Mexico is the source of the fentanyl crisis. But after a few quick searches, it was easy to discover that most fentanyl comes through legal ports of entry and involves American citizens. This article fuels the misconception that Mexico is the source of the fentynal problem. A more accurate understanding of fentanyl involves Chinese companies and smugglers, as well as American citizen drug pushers and, to a lesser extent, Mexican smugglers. This rhetoric then fuels the idea that because fentanyl is becoming an increasing problem within the United States, undocumneted immigrants are responsible for this increase, when the truth is much more complicated. More

This article seems to just be a subjective hate article against the popular artist Taylor Swift. Although it seemed like the article might have been informing against the amount of... This article seems to just be a subjective hate article against the popular artist Taylor Swift. Although it seemed like the article might have been informing against the amount of C02 emissions that the artists creates while using her private jet, it instead uses the platform to target other aspects of Swift's life. There is no good evidence to back up any statements and the article is not reliable. More

This article seems to just be a subjective hate article against the popular artist Taylor Swift. Although it seemed like the article might have been informing against the amount of... This article seems to just be a subjective hate article against the popular artist Taylor Swift. Although it seemed like the article might have been informing against the amount of C02 emissions that the artists creates while using her private jet, it instead uses the platform to target other aspects of Swift's life. There is no good evidence to back up any statements and the article is not reliable. More

This article takes an opposing stance against President Joe Biden, accusing him of backing a "genocide" that never happened. Reading the heading alone should already tell the reade... This article takes an opposing stance against President Joe Biden, accusing him of backing a "genocide" that never happened. Reading the heading alone should already tell the reader what direction this author's report will go. This article presents a strong negative bias towards Biden, supported by the explicit acknowledgment of "rising frustrations" due to his current cease-fire stance. Also, the strong accusations referring to Biden as "genocide Joe." The article lacks any actual reasoning or tangible evidence to support these claims of Biden supporting genocide in Israel. All the article's comments and quotes are opinion-based and present a very one-sided point of view. More

I can see multiple issues in this article. Firstly, where did this 'genocide' happen? This article is clearly anti-Israeli biased with no reasoning and backing for this accusation... I can see multiple issues in this article. Firstly, where did this 'genocide' happen? This article is clearly anti-Israeli biased with no reasoning and backing for this accusation. Further, President Biden is viewed very negatively, criticizing him for backing the 'genocide'. This is a serious accusation. The language used in the article supports this, with wording such as "genocidaire" or "indiscriminate killing," that both reflect a strong bias against the Biden's policies regarding Israel. More

The first troubling situation is that the reporters claim to have highly reputable references, however, it fails to name a single one of its "insiders". Following this, the reporte... The first troubling situation is that the reporters claim to have highly reputable references, however, it fails to name a single one of its "insiders". Following this, the reporters make unfounded claims, such that most of the migrants crossing the US Southern border are child rapists and terrorists. Similarly, they go on to say that the Biden administration has presumably ordered some of the migrant centers to be vacated so they could launch an illegal face recognition device in people's technology to spy them under the premises of a supposed white supremacist attack. Not only are these claims encouraging the stereotyping of migrants in the Southern border, but it is also making very consequential claims that are not proven or backed up by any reputable sources. More

The first troubling situation is that the reporters claim to have highly reputable references, however, it fails to name a single one of its "insiders". Following this, the reporte... The first troubling situation is that the reporters claim to have highly reputable references, however, it fails to name a single one of its "insiders". Following this, the reporters make unfounded claims, such that most of the migrants crossing the US Southern border are child rapists and terrorists. Similarly, they go on to say that the Biden administration has presumably ordered some of the migrant centers to be vacated so they could launch an illegal face recognition device in people's technology to spy them under the premises of a supposed white supremacist attack. Not only are these claims encouraging the stereotyping of migrants in the Southern border, but it is also making very consequential claims that are not proven or backed up by any reputable sources. More

This article by the Jacobin is clearly bias and supports a progressive cause. The article is written from an Anti-Israel perspective. It continuously praises South Africa for their... This article by the Jacobin is clearly bias and supports a progressive cause. The article is written from an Anti-Israel perspective. It continuously praises South Africa for their case at the International Court of Justice, while criticizing Israel's defense. It further describes the Middle Eastern nation as engaging in colonial violence. It further goes on to accuse international courts of traditional upholding colonial violence and inequality. The author puts no effort into understanding opposing viewpoints or covering the situation from an impartial perspective. A reader would be unable to fully understand the complex events unfolding solely from this text. More

The article by The New Yorker clearly favors a liberal ideology, consistently painting Donald Trump in a negative light. Much of the language used is meant to evoke an emotional re... The article by The New Yorker clearly favors a liberal ideology, consistently painting Donald Trump in a negative light. Much of the language used is meant to evoke an emotional response. The title alone has a negative tone, referring to the nine jurors that ruled against Trump in the Trump-Carroll defamation trial. There was high praise for the jurors for coming to this verdict, and criticisms for the former President and his tactics. More