Previous Troubling Reports

This is troubling for me because it lessens the word communist. Communists are people who round up political dissidents, suppress democratic values, and make the citizenry beholde... This is troubling for me because it lessens the word communist. Communists are people who round up political dissidents, suppress democratic values, and make the citizenry beholden to the state. Wage and price controls have already been used in the United States. That was last under Richard Nixon, and he certainly was no communist. To say that Kamala is a communist due to this policy demonstrates a basic misunderstanding of the word. More

This is troubling for me because it lessens the word communist. Communists are people who round up political dissidents, suppress democratic values, and make the citizenry beholde... This is troubling for me because it lessens the word communist. Communists are people who round up political dissidents, suppress democratic values, and make the citizenry beholden to the state. Wage and price controls have already been used in the United States. That was last under Richard Nixon, and he certainly was no communist. To say that Kamala is a communist due to this policy demonstrates a basic misunderstanding of the word. More

I do not think this article is factually correcrt and the article has a very clear bias. We can clearly see the bias of the author taking over while reported. All the reporting out... I do not think this article is factually correcrt and the article has a very clear bias. We can clearly see the bias of the author taking over while reported. All the reporting outside, saying that someone should not be allowed to stand again has a clear bias clouding their judgement. More

I do not think this article is factually correcrt and the article has a very clear bias. We can clearly see the bias of the author taking over while reported. All the reporting out... I do not think this article is factually correcrt and the article has a very clear bias. We can clearly see the bias of the author taking over while reported. All the reporting outside, saying that someone should not be allowed to stand again has a clear bias clouding their judgement. More

This article is troubling because of how clearly biased it is against Kamala Harris, her work, and the Biden administration generally. A major part of the problem is that the artic... This article is troubling because of how clearly biased it is against Kamala Harris, her work, and the Biden administration generally. A major part of the problem is that the article paints Vice President Harris out to be the sole decider in a number of different situations and places the blame entirely on her. Additionally, it blames all issues on her, but also rejects her alternatives to remedy these issues. Overall, the article is clearly biased against Vice President Harris and an unknowing reader could have the point of view seriously shifted by an article like this. More

This article is troubling because of how clearly biased it is against Kamala Harris, her work, and the Biden administration generally. A major part of the problem is that the artic... This article is troubling because of how clearly biased it is against Kamala Harris, her work, and the Biden administration generally. A major part of the problem is that the article paints Vice President Harris out to be the sole decider in a number of different situations and places the blame entirely on her. Additionally, it blames all issues on her, but also rejects her alternatives to remedy these issues. Overall, the article is clearly biased against Vice President Harris and an unknowing reader could have the point of view seriously shifted by an article like this. More

This article is troubling because of how clearly biased it is against Kamala Harris, her work, and the Biden administration generally. A major part of the problem is that the artic... This article is troubling because of how clearly biased it is against Kamala Harris, her work, and the Biden administration generally. A major part of the problem is that the article paints Vice President Harris out to be the sole decider in a number of different situations and places the blame entirely on her. Additionally, it blames all issues on her, but also rejects her alternatives to remedy these issues. Overall, the article is clearly biased against Vice President Harris and an unknowing reader could have the point of view seriously shifted by an article like this. More

This article is troubling because of how clearly biased it is against Kamala Harris, her work, and the Biden administration generally. A major part of the problem is that the artic... This article is troubling because of how clearly biased it is against Kamala Harris, her work, and the Biden administration generally. A major part of the problem is that the article paints Vice President Harris out to be the sole decider in a number of different situations and places the blame entirely on her. Additionally, it blames all issues on her, but also rejects her alternatives to remedy these issues. Overall, the article is clearly biased against Vice President Harris and an unknowing reader could have the point of view seriously shifted by an article like this. More

This article is troubling because of how clearly biased it is against Kamala Harris, her work, and the Biden administration generally. A major part of the problem is that the artic... This article is troubling because of how clearly biased it is against Kamala Harris, her work, and the Biden administration generally. A major part of the problem is that the article paints Vice President Harris out to be the sole decider in a number of different situations and places the blame entirely on her. Additionally, it blames all issues on her, but also rejects her alternatives to remedy these issues. Overall, the article is clearly biased against Vice President Harris and an unknowing reader could have the point of view seriously shifted by an article like this. More

This article is troubling because of how clearly biased it is against Kamala Harris, her work, and the Biden administration generally. A major part of the problem is that the artic... This article is troubling because of how clearly biased it is against Kamala Harris, her work, and the Biden administration generally. A major part of the problem is that the article paints Vice President Harris out to be the sole decider in a number of different situations and places the blame entirely on her. Additionally, it blames all issues on her, but also rejects her alternatives to remedy these issues. Overall, the article is clearly biased against Vice President Harris and an unknowing reader could have the point of view seriously shifted by an article like this. More

This article is troubling because of how clearly biased it is against Kamala Harris, her work, and the Biden administration generally. A major part of the problem is that the artic... This article is troubling because of how clearly biased it is against Kamala Harris, her work, and the Biden administration generally. A major part of the problem is that the article paints Vice President Harris out to be the sole decider in a number of different situations and places the blame entirely on her. Additionally, it blames all issues on her, but also rejects her alternatives to remedy these issues. Overall, the article is clearly biased against Vice President Harris and an unknowing reader could have the point of view seriously shifted by an article like this. More

This article is troubling because of how clearly biased it is against Kamala Harris, her work, and the Biden administration generally. A major part of the problem is that the artic... This article is troubling because of how clearly biased it is against Kamala Harris, her work, and the Biden administration generally. A major part of the problem is that the article paints Vice President Harris out to be the sole decider in a number of different situations and places the blame entirely on her. Additionally, it blames all issues on her, but also rejects her alternatives to remedy these issues. Overall, the article is clearly biased against Vice President Harris and an unknowing reader could have the point of view seriously shifted by an article like this. More