Sources

All

Followed

Bias

All

Liberal

Center

Conservative

Source Analysis Score

All

Excellent (90%-100%)

Good (70%-89.99%)

Fair (50%-69.99%)

Fair (30%-49.99%)

Poor (10%-29.99%)

Poor (0%-9.99%)

July 26, 2024

Why Troubling News:

This article is biased for its use of subjective and loaded terms such as "third-world status" and "holed up." It is evident that the author has bias against Biden and his decision to drop out based on the use of these terms and overall accusatory and negative tone. The article also does not include sources to back up its fact reporting, such as Biden not being able to use his own Twitter account or that he himself did not know he dropped out. Although this is an opinion article, the author is still obligated to provide facts and reliable sources to support their reasoning and biases, which the author has not done.

July 26, 2024

Why Troubling News:

This article is biased for its use of subjective and loaded terms such as "third-world status" and "holed up." It is evident that the author has bias against Biden and his decision to drop out based on the use of these terms and overall accusatory and negative tone. The article also does not include sources to back up its fact reporting, such as Biden not being able to use his own Twitter account or that he himself did not know he dropped out. Although this is an opinion article, the author is still obligated to provide facts and reliable sources to support their reasoning and biases, which the author has not done.

July 26, 2024

Why Troubling News:

This article is biased for its use of subjective and loaded terms such as "third-world status" and "holed up." It is evident that the author has bias against Biden and his decision to drop out based on the use of these terms and overall accusatory and negative tone. The article also does not include sources to back up its fact reporting, such as Biden not being able to use his own Twitter account or that he himself did not know he dropped out. Although this is an opinion article, the author is still obligated to provide facts and reliable sources to support their reasoning and biases, which the author has not done.

July 26, 2024

Why Troubling News:

This article is biased for its use of subjective and loaded terms such as "third-world status" and "holed up." It is evident that the author has bias against Biden and his decision to drop out based on the use of these terms and overall accusatory and negative tone. The article also does not include sources to back up its fact reporting, such as Biden not being able to use his own Twitter account or that he himself did not know he dropped out. Although this is an opinion article, the author is still obligated to provide facts and reliable sources to support their reasoning and biases, which the author has not done.

July 26, 2024

Why Troubling News:

Nowhere in this article is it stated that this is an opinion piece. Yet, the entire writing style---from title to phrases of "his heroic war record" treats this as an op-ed. The article is clear in taking Kamala's side "Vice-President Kamala Harris has been thrust into the harshest spotlight imaginable as the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee" and takes no care to talk about JD Vance, Biden, Trump, or anyone else. Instead of being an analysis piece on her chance of success, policy stances, etc, it is a discussion of the "harshest" criticism she faces.

July 26, 2024

Why Troubling News:

This article contains a substantial liberal bias, the author describes the republican party as "hapless", along with other similar adjectives leading to an overall negative sentiment towards conservatives. The article's goal does not seem to be to provide information or opinion in a neutral format but rather to describe how Republicans are subpar. The title alone contains bias and paints an early narrative of incompetency.

July 26, 2024

Why Troubling News:

This article is factually correct because it talks about Biden dropping out and endorsing Kamala Harris as the next candidate. However it uses sentences such as "A Harris-Trump contest would present a stark contrast between Harris — 59, Black, Asian and the first woman to serve as vice president — against the 78-year-old Trump, a convicted felon whose presidency and campaign have been laced with racist and misogynistic underpinnings. Trump would become the oldest president in office by the end of his term. Harris would be the first female president." This sentence shows a clear bias towards the democratic party. It clearly shows Harris as the best candidate and Trump as an unfit one.

July 25, 2024

Why Troubling News:

Starbucks did not sponsor the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee last week. However, they were providing coffee and other beverages to first responders at five of the RNC venues, in order to uphold a partnership with a Milwaukee nonpartisan host committee. The news that they sponsored it is troubling because a sponsorship for an event of this magnitude has serious implications, and such a claim cannot be taken lightly. A multi-billion-dollar franchise like Starbucks may have their reputation put in jeopardy if they became politicized.

July 25, 2024

Why Troubling News:

Starbucks did not sponsor the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee last week. However, they were providing coffee and other beverages to first responders at five of the RNC venues, in order to uphold a partnership with a Milwaukee nonpartisan host committee. The news that they sponsored it is troubling because a sponsorship for an event of this magnitude has serious implications, and such a claim cannot be taken lightly. A multi-billion-dollar franchise like Starbucks may have their reputation put in jeopardy if they became politicized.

July 25, 2024

Why Troubling News:

Starbucks did not sponsor the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee last week. However, they were providing coffee and other beverages to first responders at five of the RNC venues, in order to uphold a partnership with a Milwaukee nonpartisan host committee. The news that they sponsored it is troubling because a sponsorship for an event of this magnitude has serious implications, and such a claim cannot be taken lightly. A multi-billion-dollar franchise like Starbucks may have their reputation put in jeopardy if they became politicized.