CoingapeUN Embraces AI: Rules Out Landmark Global Resolution Led By US
- Bias Rating
-46% Medium Left
- Reliability
50% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-46% Medium Left
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Log In
Log in to your account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
37% Positive
- Liberal
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
59% : Aligning with the dynamic global tech landscape, as AI continues to push the boundaries of organizations, this pivotal move by the main policy-making organ of the UN promptly nabbed significant attention.57% : Intriguingly, the United States-led resolution draft was initially spotlighted by Linda Thomas-Greenfield, U.S. Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the UN.
55% : US Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the UN, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, further draws attention to the resolution's objective.
55% : Meanwhile, the Assembly also impelled all member states, the private sector, civil society, research organizations, and the media sector to promote the development and backing of secure and reliable AI regulations.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.