Daily Discussion
https://nypost.com/2025/04/25/tech/apple-issues-warning-to-iphone-users-to-delete-popular-app/
The headline puts a certain idea in the viewer's head that differs from the actual article's contents. It tries to push an urgent message and create alarm in the audience, when in reality the truth is Apple released an ad subtly bashing Google Chrome for its lack of privacy and promoting Safari, "the browser that's actually private" instead. The article does not even provide research or enough reasoning as to why Safari is a private, "better" browser. They claim Apple’s argument that Safari is safer has been backed up by experts, and the only source they provide is a blog post. They don't even explain that Safari doesn't use cookies which helps their point, only the vague quote from the blog post: "When it comes down to your security, Safari is probably your best bet,”.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/trump-says-reciprocal-tariffs-could-re-imposed-within-weeks
The title of this news article could be misleading. It implies that tariffs are being re-imposed without any further consideration or discussion. However, the actual article explains that deals with other countries are being considered before the implementation of tariffs.
The title of this article lends to the idea that what Norway is doing is malicious. The actions of Norway are measures that they see as a growth opportunity in the midst of global uncertainty about educational preferences of the United States. The words "lure" and "scheme" are negative and make Norway seen evil or misleading in a way when they are trying to bring in good research and education.
This incident was troubling because the manipulated visual narrative was used to mislead the public and discredit a serious diplomatic meeting. Some American media figures, including on platforms like Newsmax, amplified the false narrative without fact-checking, further distorting public understanding.
Article title gives the assumption that the trans athlete's absence was the reason for the team's loss, even though it gave no numerical/statistical evidence of it. Hence the misleading title.