Daily Discussion

This "article" as a whole is very unprofessional. There is no background on where the information was taken from, and no linked sources/evidence to back up the claim. A single sentence is not enough to effectively inform readers.

This "article" as a whole is very unprofessional. There is no background on where the information was taken from, and no linked sources/evidence to back up the claim. A single sentence is not enough to effectively inform readers.

This seems to be a blatantly false take and deeply irresponsible journalism. There is absolutely nothing to support this and zero common sense suggests it. Regardless of what you think regarding Epstein and the current administrations actions about it, the idea that a sitting president would have this information and use it as blackmail as an apparently noble cause is absurd. It's an article that doesn't pass the smell test remotely, and if it does for you then frankly you should work on your critical thinking skills.

This article uses rhetoric from the Trump administration to push the idea that "Alligator Alcatraz" is necessary and houses only criminals, while only having 1 piece of evidence (a social media post) as backup. It also fails to ignore statistics coming out that show most detainees from ICE raids do not have criminal records.

This article claims that Trump's cuts to the NWS played a part in the poor forecasts leading up to the flash floods in Texas. Other reports tell us that warnings were sent out before the event occurred, and that the NWS did what it was supposed to do during the crisis. While initial rain forecasts underestimated rainfall amounts, this cannot be directly tied to cuts to the NWS, since weather forecasts are naturally difficult to get right.