Ideally, improving infrastructure and resources for both public and private vehicle transportation should be implemented. Funds for both public and personal vehicle use should be contingent on the …Read MoreIdeally, improving infrastructure and resources for both public and private vehicle transportation should be implemented. Funds for both public and personal vehicle use should be contingent on the location of transportation infrastructure. For example, downtown Denver or NYC should prioritize public transportation resources when compared to cities that are more spread out, like Tucson or Bakersfield, which require personal vehicles to move freely around the city.Read Less
Maybe. While I do think that in heavily urbanized areas, prioritizing the use of public transport over personal vehicle use would be beneficial, I do no think that this type of sustainable urban …Read MoreMaybe. While I do think that in heavily urbanized areas, prioritizing the use of public transport over personal vehicle use would be beneficial, I do no think that this type of sustainable urban development can function effectively everywhere. For this reason, it should not always be prioritized over personal vehicle use. This is because many rural or suburban areas lack the infrastructure, accessibility, and population density needed to support efficient public transportation systems. Therefore, personal vehicles can be more practical and necessary for daily transportaion for many people/communities.Read Less
Although both are important I think public transport generally just takes more committment.
Ideally, improving infrastructure and resources for both public and private vehicle transportation should be implemented. Funds for both public and personal vehicle use should be contingent on the …Read MoreIdeally, improving infrastructure and resources for both public and private vehicle transportation should be implemented. Funds for both public and personal vehicle use should be contingent on the location of transportation infrastructure. For example, downtown Denver or NYC should prioritize public transportation resources when compared to cities that are more spread out, like Tucson or Bakersfield, which require personal vehicles to move freely around the city. Read Less
Maybe. While I do think that in heavily urbanized areas, prioritizing the use of public transport over personal vehicle use would be beneficial, I do no think that this type of sustainable urban …Read MoreMaybe. While I do think that in heavily urbanized areas, prioritizing the use of public transport over personal vehicle use would be beneficial, I do no think that this type of sustainable urban development can function effectively everywhere. For this reason, it should not always be prioritized over personal vehicle use. This is because many rural or suburban areas lack the infrastructure, accessibility, and population density needed to support efficient public transportation systems. Therefore, personal vehicles can be more practical and necessary for daily transportaion for many people/communities. Read Less