Here We Go Again: Federal Judge Blocks Yet Another Key Trump Illegal Immigration Policy

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

57% : During his first term as president, Trump in 2017 signed a similar executive order targeting sanctuary jurisdictions.
46% : Related: Trump Says It Would Take Hundreds of Years to Do What Supreme Court Asks -- '
44% : The cities, in open defiance of the federal government, are nevertheless permanently entitled to our taxpayer dollars because they might face "budgetary uncertainty?" We knew the Dems and progressive media would attack Trump with full force the moment he stepped into the Oval Office, but their game isn't working nearly as well as it did during his first term.
40% : I feel like I could write a variation of this sentence almost any day of the week: "Federal judge blocks Trump's [insert anything he does here]..." Since Thursday ends in a "y," yet another jurist has decided to dictate federal policy on illegal immigration.
31% : Ridiculous Situation We Are In' "The Cities and Counties have also demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm.
30% : The threat to withhold funding causes them irreparable injury in the form of budgetary uncertainty, deprivation of constitutional rights, and undermining trust between the Cities and Counties and the communities they serve.
19% : The lawsuit challenged an executive order Trump signed that threatened to cut off federal funding to sanctuary jurisdictions that limit or refuse to cooperate with federal immigration law enforcement, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.