Daily Report
“SNAP users brace for hungry weekend after Trump admin appeals order for full SNAP benefits”
What caught my eye was the article's title, which uses emotionally charged language and exaggerates the situation at hand. Using phrases such as "brace for a hungry weekend" suggests (or eludes to) imminent widespread hunger, even thought the actual article text later clarifies that the appeal process is underway with only partial SNAP benefit payments being delayed. The title uses language that invokes fear and blame instead of just neutrally explaining the routine legal context of the issue. This deliberate decision to make the title more "clickbait-worthy" makes the article, at first glance, feel more sensational--which might end up misleading readers about the real scope of the situation, leading to skewed/misled opinions.
Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I completely agree that this article uses catastrophic language to provoke fear and blame towards one political party. The sensationalism in modern journalism has made it exponentially more difficult …Read MoreI completely agree that this article uses catastrophic language to provoke fear and blame towards one political party. The sensationalism in modern journalism has made it exponentially more difficult to decipher journalistic truth from clear bias, making Biasly an important tool in the media sphere. This becomes clear when reading articles of this nature, where they walk back their sensational claims as the facts come into consideration, thus making the writer’s initial bias even more transparent. Read Less