Free Press Journal Article RatingReduce GST On Air Purifiers If Clean Air Can't Be Ensured: Delhi High Court To Centre
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
25% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-3% Negative
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
48% : A two-judge Bench of the Delhi High Court, led by Chief Justice Devendra Kumar and comprising Justice Tushar Rao, observed that if authorities cannot provide clean air to people, then the Goods and Services Tax (GST) on air purifiers should be reduced.47% : It contends that air purifiers have become essential for maintaining minimally safe indoor air quality and that the current tax burden is arbitrary, unreasonable, and constitutionally impermissible.
41% : The petition challenges the 18 per cent GST levied on air purifiers, arguing that the high tax rate makes these devices financially inaccessible to large sections of the population.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.