Delhi High Court asks GST Council to urgently review tax on air purifiers
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
15% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
N/A
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Log In
Log in to your account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
15% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
57% : The Court observed that such a step would require directions to the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare to issue a notification, following which the matter could be placed before the GST Council.53% : Counsel for the Central government informed the Court that decisions on tax rates were policy matters taken by the GST Council, which includes members from all states, and that convening a meeting required action by the Union finance minister.
52% : The Delhi High Court on Wednesday said that an urgent meeting of the Goods and Services Tax Council should be convened to examine the classification of air purifiers as medical devices and consider reducing the GST levied on them from 18 per cent to 5 per cent, as reported in the matter of Kapil Madan vs Union of India and others.
46% : It argued that levying 18 per cent GST on such devices was arbitrary, unreasonable and disproportionate, and that continued imposition of the higher tax rate despite their medically recognised role amounted to an unjustified fiscal classification lacking a rational nexus with public health objectives.
43% : The petition was filed through advocates Gurmukh Singh Arora and Rahul Matharu, while advocate Akash Panwar appeared for the Central Board of Indirect Taxes.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.