Understand the bias, discover the truth in your news. Get Started
storyboard18.com Article Rating

Delhi High Court asks GST Council to urgently review tax on air purifiers

  • Bias Rating
  • Reliability

    15% ReliableLimited

  • Policy Leaning

    N/A

  • Politician Portrayal

    N/A

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

15% Positive

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

57% : The Court observed that such a step would require directions to the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare to issue a notification, following which the matter could be placed before the GST Council.
53% : Counsel for the Central government informed the Court that decisions on tax rates were policy matters taken by the GST Council, which includes members from all states, and that convening a meeting required action by the Union finance minister.
52% : The Delhi High Court on Wednesday said that an urgent meeting of the Goods and Services Tax Council should be convened to examine the classification of air purifiers as medical devices and consider reducing the GST levied on them from 18 per cent to 5 per cent, as reported in the matter of Kapil Madan vs Union of India and others.
46% : It argued that levying 18 per cent GST on such devices was arbitrary, unreasonable and disproportionate, and that continued imposition of the higher tax rate despite their medically recognised role amounted to an unjustified fiscal classification lacking a rational nexus with public health objectives.
43% : The petition was filed through advocates Gurmukh Singh Arora and Rahul Matharu, while advocate Akash Panwar appeared for the Central Board of Indirect Taxes.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Category
Topic
Copy link