Understand the bias, discover the truth in your news. Get Started
Beijing Review Article Rating

Advancing global AI governance through joint endeavors

  • Bias Rating
  • Reliability

    15% ReliableLimited

  • Policy Leaning

    -98% Very Left

  • Politician Portrayal

    N/A

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

-12% Negative

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

71% : It actively promotes UN principles in both bilateral and multilateral settings and works to translate UN initiatives into concrete outcomes.
65% : In addition, China co-hosted with the UN Secretariat the first AI Capacity-Building Workshop in Shanghai, which drew representatives from nearly 40 countries and achieved positive results.
63% : The resolution also reaffirms support for the UN's central role in international cooperation to achieve inclusive, beneficial, and sustainable AI development.
63% : China has also been an active participant in the UN capacity-building network, helping developing countries cultivate expertise in AI science and applications through workshops that range from foundational theory to hands-on practice.
62% : In September 2024, China introduced the AI Capacity-Building Action Plan for Good and for All (ACBAPGA) at the United Nations High-Level Meeting on International Cooperation on Artificial Intelligence Capacity-Building, setting out five key principles: sovereign equality, orientation toward development, people-centeredness, inclusiveness and collaborative cooperation.
61% : The Shanghai Declaration on Global AI Governance advocates establishing a global governance mechanism, reinforcing the UN's central role, and enhancing the representation and voice of developing countries.
60% : As a responsible major country committed to advancing AI development in a people-centered and beneficial manner, China supports the United Nations in playing the central role in global AI governance.
60% : In June 2024, with joint sponsorship or support from China, the United States and 120 other countries, the 78th UN General Assembly adopted its first-ever resolution on AI, calling for it to benefit all countries and regions, bridge the digital divide, advance digital transformation, and promote peace.
60% : As a key promoter, China has fulfilled its responsibilities by introducing the ACBAPGA as a measure to enhance implementation of the UN General Assembly resolution on strengthening international cooperation in AI capacity-building.
55% : The Rio de Janeiro Declaration stressed that global AI governance should focus on reducing risks, responding to the needs of all countries -- including those of the Global South -- building a UN-centered governance system, and promoting the responsible development and application of technologies in support of sustainable development.
48% : For instance, the United States is moving toward deregulation, whereas the European Union has established a rules-based system through hard law, leaving standards difficult to align.
42% : For instance, the AI visual hub system of Chinese company Vietadata integrates more than 50 algorithms with digital twin technologies to provide real-time monitoring and automated management of the Djibouti Free Trade Zone.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Category
Topic
Copy link