Beijing Review Article RatingAdvancing global AI governance through joint endeavors
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
15% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
-98% Very Left
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Log In
Log in to your account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-12% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
71% : It actively promotes UN principles in both bilateral and multilateral settings and works to translate UN initiatives into concrete outcomes.65% : In addition, China co-hosted with the UN Secretariat the first AI Capacity-Building Workshop in Shanghai, which drew representatives from nearly 40 countries and achieved positive results.
63% : The resolution also reaffirms support for the UN's central role in international cooperation to achieve inclusive, beneficial, and sustainable AI development.
63% : China has also been an active participant in the UN capacity-building network, helping developing countries cultivate expertise in AI science and applications through workshops that range from foundational theory to hands-on practice.
62% : In September 2024, China introduced the AI Capacity-Building Action Plan for Good and for All (ACBAPGA) at the United Nations High-Level Meeting on International Cooperation on Artificial Intelligence Capacity-Building, setting out five key principles: sovereign equality, orientation toward development, people-centeredness, inclusiveness and collaborative cooperation.
61% : The Shanghai Declaration on Global AI Governance advocates establishing a global governance mechanism, reinforcing the UN's central role, and enhancing the representation and voice of developing countries.
60% : As a responsible major country committed to advancing AI development in a people-centered and beneficial manner, China supports the United Nations in playing the central role in global AI governance.
60% : In June 2024, with joint sponsorship or support from China, the United States and 120 other countries, the 78th UN General Assembly adopted its first-ever resolution on AI, calling for it to benefit all countries and regions, bridge the digital divide, advance digital transformation, and promote peace.
60% : As a key promoter, China has fulfilled its responsibilities by introducing the ACBAPGA as a measure to enhance implementation of the UN General Assembly resolution on strengthening international cooperation in AI capacity-building.
55% : The Rio de Janeiro Declaration stressed that global AI governance should focus on reducing risks, responding to the needs of all countries -- including those of the Global South -- building a UN-centered governance system, and promoting the responsible development and application of technologies in support of sustainable development.
48% : For instance, the United States is moving toward deregulation, whereas the European Union has established a rules-based system through hard law, leaving standards difficult to align.
42% : For instance, the AI visual hub system of Chinese company Vietadata integrates more than 50 algorithms with digital twin technologies to provide real-time monitoring and automated management of the Djibouti Free Trade Zone.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.