Throughline News Article RatingThe Regime's Demand: Believe Them, Not Your Own Eyes
- Bias Rating
-96% Very Left
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-94% Very Left
- Politician Portrayal
-44% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Log In
Log in to your account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-16% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
62% : ICE is of course all over the country.57% : ICE agents then refused to let medical professionals through to render aid.
55% : The ICE officers were not trying to push a car out of the snow; they were surrounding Good's vehicle.
55% : ICE supporters say Good was accelerating toward an officer who feared for his life.
53% : The president and his lackeys want a loyal personal militia, and they've created one in ICE.
52% : Why aren't we expecting ICE officers to comport themselves with basic professionalism?
51% : Think what you will about her actions -- and ICE supporters generally argue she didn't follow the ICE agent's directives, and that as her car rolled forward he believed he had a right to act in self-defense -- but the evidence is front of all of our faces.
49% : It's possible this standard doesn't apply to ICE, which is at this point little more than a personal presidential militia.
49% : And his administration ramped up ICE activity in Minnesota explicitly to hunt down Somalis, who are the current favored target of all manner of MAGA racists.
47% : She did not block ICE officers.
47% : It's clear that, whatever you believe about the ICE agent's self-defense claim, Good was not a violent rioter.
44% : She did not attempt to kill ICE officers.
44% : She did not attempt to run over ICE agents who were simply trying to push their car out of the snow.
40% : What's different now, though, is that the people in the White House aren't even pretending they want to find out the truth; they aren't even pretending that ICE officers are held to high (or any) standards.
36% : A mother gunned down by ICE in Minnesota.
32% : On Wednesday, ICE agents pulled up to Minnesota mother Renee Good's car and shouted a series of confusing, contradictory demands.
29% : DHS secretary Kristi Noem offered a totally different lie, claiming that ICE officers got their car stuck in the snow and "they were attempting to push out their vehicle and a woman attacked them and those surrounding them, and attempted to run them over and ram them with her vehicle.
26% : "Today, ICE officers in Minneapolis were conducting targeted operations when rioters began blocking ICE officers and one of these violent rioters weaponized her vehicle, attempting to run over our law enforcement officers in an attempt to kill them -- an act of domestic terrorism," the statement reads in part.
19% : It's important to understand why ICE was in Minneapolis specifically, and the answer also comes down to a series of right-wing lies alternately amplified and created by the Trump administration.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.