US officially exits World Health Organization, accusing agency of straying 'from its core mission'
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
60% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
8% Center
- Politician Portrayal
55% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Log In
Log in to your account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
61% : Trump signed an executive order last year, beginning the withdrawal process.The U.S. has officially completed its withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO), the Trump administration announced on Thursday.It comes exactly one year after President Donald Trump signed an executive order to begin the process of withdrawal.The move was announced by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Department of State.A senior HHS official said on Thursday that the WHO "strayed from its core mission and has acted contrary to the U.S. interests in protecting the U.S. public on multiple occasions."The HHS focused much of its critique on the WHO's actions during the COVID-19 pandemic, claiming that it delayed its response in declaring COVID-19 to be a global health emergency, and saying the organization unfairly criticized Trump for actions such as shutting down travel from certain foreign countries during the early days of the pandemic.The HHS also argued that other countries, such as China, have been contributing less monetarily than the U.S. and that there has never been an American director-general of the WHO despite the amount of money the U.S. has contributed.A flag of the World Health Organization (WHO) waves in the wind at their headquarters in Geneva, on March 13, 2025.Fabrice Coffrini/AFP via Getty ImagesPublic health experts have criticized the withdrawal from the WHO saying it will put the U.S. at a disadvantage when it comes to responding to health crises at home and abroad.51% : Global cooperation is not a luxury; it is a biological necessity," he said.The senior HHS official said the U.S. will continue to be a leader in global public health and that HHS already has more than 2,000 staff members in 63 countries and has bilateral agreements with hundreds of countries.To fill the gaps that will be left by exiting the WHO, the official said there are "plans" in place to work with organizations on surveillance, diagnostics and outbreak response.For a country to leave the WHO, the United Nations says there are criteria including giving one year's notice and paying all the dues it owes.The U.S. gave one year's notice when Trump signed the executive order.
49% : He added that leaving the WHO will also impact the U.S.'s ability to match vaccines to circulating flu strains."Withdrawing from the World Health Organization is scientifically reckless.
42% : "The U.S. withdrawal from the World Health Organization is a shortsighted and misguided abandonment of our global health commitments.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
ABC News