Counter Punch Article RatingProfit Over People: How the World Fuels Sudan's War
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
45% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Log In
Log in to your account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-29% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
55% : European border security, like resource extraction, externalizes violence: comfort, stability, and consumption in Europe are preserved at the expense of Sudanese lives.51% : In 2016-2017, the EU paid €160 million to al-Bashir's government to curb migration toward Europe.
50% : Neighbouring countries serve as key transit routes, while both SAF and RSF continue to receive arms despite a long-standing UN embargo on Darfur.
46% : Until trade and financial lifelines are disrupted through sanctions, trade regulation and political rupture, calls for peace will remain performative.
39% : Armed actors along transport routes impose informal taxes, seize animals, and convert trade into war finance.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.