Mail Online Article RatingReport: The Queen pressed for Andrew to become trade envoy
- Bias Rating
-54% Medium Left
- Reliability
20% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
-54% Medium Left
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Log In
Log in to your account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
47% Positive
- Liberal
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
41% : Her Majesty pushed for her second son to take on a 'prominent role in the promotion of national interests' ahead of his appointment in 2001, then-chief executive of British Trade International Sir David Wright said.41% : 'And this is due to the fact that the role was a continuation of the Royal Family's involvement in trade and investment promotion work following the Duke of Kent's decision to relinquish his duties as vice chairman of British Trade International.'
39% : Andrew became the UK's special representative for international trade and investment in 2001 but stepped down ten years later due to the furore over his friendship with [child predator] financier Epstein.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.