The Guardian Article RatingSleaze is back and children are hungry – for Project Burnham, these have to be top priorities | Polly Toynbee
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
65% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Log In
Log in to your account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
50% : Take the Mail on Sunday’s splash: “Burnham plots homes tax raid on middle class”.49% : But rarely is influence quite as blatant as Reform makes it appear: a Thai-based crypto billionaire bankrolls the party and gives Farage £5m, and Reform promises a “cryptoassets and digital finance” bill that shrinks crypto capital gains tax to 10%, creates a Treasury bitcoin reserve fund and lets taxes be paid in crypto.To prove that a cap is nonpartisan, Labour would have to forgo its union funding.
43% : You’ll find it around the median salary of £39,039, the midpoint where half the population earns more and half less.The Sunday Telegraph was at it too, splashing on “Blair warns Burnham: Don’t raise capital gains tax”, amid speculation that Burnham could raise £11bn by equalising unearned capital gains tax with hard-earned income tax.
40% : Defending gross inequality, they make political donations or they use the media they own to grossly misrepresent wealth and taxes, while abusing the poor as “shirkers v strivers”.
36% : Watch them resist minor wealth taxes by misleading ordinary earners that it will affect them.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.