Asian Lite Article RatingMamdani Targets Netanyahu, Then Backs Down
- Bias Rating
-18% Somewhat Left
- Reliability
35% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-60% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Log In
Log in to your account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-7% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
42% : Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote in a Wall Street Journal opinion article last week that "US soldiers, police officers, Border Patrol agents and elected leaders could be dragged before" international judges.41% : The United States, however, is not a member of the ICC and has consistently rejected the court's jurisdiction over US citizens and close allies, including Israel.
38% : His administration has taken a confrontational stance towards the ICC, imposing sanctions on judges and officials involved in investigations concerning the US and Israel.
30% : Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon dismissed Mamdani's comments, describing him as a "clown" and calling his "baseless remarks about harassing the prime minister -- it's a joke".
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.