Three years from October 7. Cover-ups and lies still shielding Netanyahu - Michael West

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

45% : A UN commission of inquiry found in June 2024 that Israeli forces applied the directive and likely killed at least 14 Israeli civilians.
44% : None of this excuses Hamas's murders, but demolishes the demand that Israel's official narrative be accepted without interrogation.
39% : Some sexual violence allegations collapsed, although UN investigators found grounds to believe rape occurred.
39% : The cover Haaretz reported that on October 7 itself Qatar passed on a Hamas proposal to release civilian hostages, and that Israel declined to negotiate.
38% : Israel's own military investigation said Nova was not a predetermined Hamas target.
38% : Israel's own military concluded that hostage Efrat Katz was probably killed by fire from one of its helicopters.
37% : Israel has barred foreign reporters from entering Gaza independently since 2023, and the Committee to Protect Journalists counts more than 200 journalists and media workers killed there.
36% : Israel failed to protect its people and demanded the world accept Gaza's devastation as the price of their deaths.
35% : A UN commission calls Gaza genocide and the International Criminal Court wants him arrested.
35% : UN investigators found reasonable grounds to believe rape occurred at several locations, and found two widely circulated Be'eri allegations unfounded.
34% : In 2023, military intelligence wrote to Netanyahu directly, warning that Israel's enemies saw a country weakened by his judicial overhaul.
31% : Behind that shield sits a damning record: ignored intelligence, reported warnings to Netanyahu, catastrophic failures at Nova, Hannibal directives killing hostages, false atrocity stories and a reported opportunity to negotiate civilian hostage releases that Israel declined.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.