End Time Headlines Article RatingHackers Expose Identities of More Than 41,000 DHS Employees in Sweeping Data Breach
- Bias Rating
-10% Center
- Reliability
30% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-8% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Log In
Log in to your account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
20% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% : "This is what happens to ICE when you do that.56% : It does, however, include substantial numbers of employees from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, and Customs and Border Protection.
47% : Yet several ICE officers and Customs and Border Protection agents contacted by The Washington Post using information from the leaked database -- in Tucson, Philadelphia, and East Texas -- reported that they had not yet been notified.
42% : " A former ICE official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the agency's Homeland Security Investigations intelligence unit quickly circulated a bulletin alerting personnel.
15% : John Sandweg, who served as acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement during the Obama administration, called it a "nightmare scenario."
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.