New York Post Article RatingHow George Soros funds 'fact checkers' to silence dissent
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
45% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
64% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
-60% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
41% : Emily Venezky predictably rates Owens' claim "False" while citing a 2015 Snopes fact check that admits Soros donated $33 million to organizations "that have worked with Black Lives Matter or worked to raise awareness during the Ferguson-related protests" in the past.38% : In a similar vein, PolitiFact's Yacob Reyes wrote an article to debunk claims that Soros was funding Black Lives Matter -- only to admit and downplay his funding of BLM-adjacent groups.
34% : Writing in response to Owens saying that Soros "injected $33 million into Black Lives Matter," Reyes rated the claim "False" because the groups weren't official BLM groups -- but merely radical far-left groups that share virtually an identical ideology to Black Lives Matter (and everything else Soros funds) and engage in the same kind of disruptive activities.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.