Trump prosecutor Fani Willis subpoenaed for grant money records

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

30% : The back and forth between Jordan and Willis began last year with correspondence Jordan sent on 24 August, the day Trump stood for a mugshot at the Fulton county jail.
19% : The subpoena escalates the conflict between Jim Jordan, the Ohio Republican congressman, judiciary committee chair and ardent defender of Donald Trump, and Willis, whose office charged the former president and 18 others with 41 counts over interfering with a Georgia election and illegally attempting to undo Biden's victory in Georgia.
17% : Jordan's letter suggested Willis had subjected Trump to "politically motivated state investigations and prosecutions due to the policies they advanced as president", and that any coordination her office had with federal prosecutors may have been an improperly partisan use of federal money.
13% : Willis's scorching response in subsequent replies said the inquiry offends principles of state sovereignty and the separation of powers; that it interferes with a criminal investigation; that Trump is not immune to prosecution simply because he is a candidate for public office; and that Jordan himself was "ignorant of the US constitution".

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.