The Western Journal Article RatingDemocrats Brag About '30,000 People' Who Showed Up at Kamala Rally - Now Look at the Numbers on Trump's Joe Rogan Appearance
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
55% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
-9% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-7% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
61% : Trump, halfway across Texas, was drawing millions of more people, and that was just on YouTube.46% : Meanwhile, Rogan -- whose political views tend toward that of a heterodox independent -- said that he wanted Trump in after the assassination attempt against him.
45% : I picked some people that I shouldn't have picked," Trump said during the interview.
16% : "Yeah, neocons, or bad people, or disloyal people," Trump said, specifically naming former White House chief of staff John Kelly and former National Security Advisor John Bolton.
10% : The interview itself was notable in several way, notably for Trump actually acknowledging a mistake (one more than Harris, at least) in terms of "bad choices" in terms of "neocons" "The biggest mistake I made ...
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
