Today, high-speed internet is very essential for education and jobs. There should be access to internet in every house, specifically highlighting those lower-income households.
Yes, I do think that urban planning should prioritize access to high-speed internet as a utility. I think this because this is an age where internet has become essential for school, jobs, healthcare, …Read MoreYes, I do think that urban planning should prioritize access to high-speed internet as a utility. I think this because this is an age where internet has become essential for school, jobs, healthcare, communication, TV entertainment, phone use–basically everything. So, making internet a priority during development, regardless of income or location, will allow for people to have equal opportunity to participate in the digital economy and online services that have fundamentally changed the way this world operates.Read Less
Yes, I think urban planning should prioritize access to high-speed internet as a utility. When we refer to utilities, it means essential resources necessary for sustaining daily life and social …Read MoreYes, I think urban planning should prioritize access to high-speed internet as a utility. When we refer to utilities, it means essential resources necessary for sustaining daily life and social participation. To address this issue, we need to measure whether internet access meets that threshold of necessity, and I would firmly argue that it does. In today’s world, even the most routine activities depend on digital transactions. The absence of high-speed internet, therefore, does not simply mean inconvenience; it signifies exclusion from fundamental social and economic activities. If that is the case, internet accessibility should be treated as critical public infrastructure, on par with water and electricity, in any modern urban planning framework.Read Less
Today, high-speed internet is very essential for education and jobs. There should be access to internet in every house, specifically highlighting those lower-income households.
I think urban planning has many other issues to focus on but high speed internet seems to be a good addition to that long list.
Yes, I do think that urban planning should prioritize access to high-speed internet as a utility. I think this because this is an age where internet has become essential for school, jobs, healthcare, …Read MoreYes, I do think that urban planning should prioritize access to high-speed internet as a utility. I think this because this is an age where internet has become essential for school, jobs, healthcare, communication, TV entertainment, phone use–basically everything. So, making internet a priority during development, regardless of income or location, will allow for people to have equal opportunity to participate in the digital economy and online services that have fundamentally changed the way this world operates. Read Less
Yes, I think urban planning should prioritize access to high-speed internet as a utility. When we refer to utilities, it means essential resources necessary for sustaining daily life and social …Read MoreYes, I think urban planning should prioritize access to high-speed internet as a utility. When we refer to utilities, it means essential resources necessary for sustaining daily life and social participation. To address this issue, we need to measure whether internet access meets that threshold of necessity, and I would firmly argue that it does. In today’s world, even the most routine activities depend on digital transactions. The absence of high-speed internet, therefore, does not simply mean inconvenience; it signifies exclusion from fundamental social and economic activities. If that is the case, internet accessibility should be treated as critical public infrastructure, on par with water and electricity, in any modern urban planning framework. Read Less