Yes, international law should address the militarization of AI because current AI systems remain imperfect and the risks of escalation and civilian harm are real. First, AI can misidentify targets or …Read MoreYes, international law should address the militarization of AI because current AI systems remain imperfect and the risks of escalation and civilian harm are real. First, AI can misidentify targets or fail under uncertainty, and those errors can produce irreversible harm to civilians in wartime. conditions. Second, AI can lower the human cost for the user state, and that reduced domestic political cost can make leaders more willing to use force or to sustain conflict. Third, the main weakness is compliance, since international laws often lack strong enforcement and state sometimes violate them. However, a legal framework can still set shared standards for human control, accountability, and transparency, and it can raise reputational and diplomatic costs for violations. For these reasons, international law need to address how states develop and deploy military AI even if enforcement remains imperfect.Read Less
Yes, international law should address the militarization of AI because current AI systems remain imperfect and the risks of escalation and civilian harm are real. First, AI can misidentify targets or …Read MoreYes, international law should address the militarization of AI because current AI systems remain imperfect and the risks of escalation and civilian harm are real. First, AI can misidentify targets or fail under uncertainty, and those errors can produce irreversible harm to civilians in wartime. conditions. Second, AI can lower the human cost for the user state, and that reduced domestic political cost can make leaders more willing to use force or to sustain conflict. Third, the main weakness is compliance, since international laws often lack strong enforcement and state sometimes violate them. However, a legal framework can still set shared standards for human control, accountability, and transparency, and it can raise reputational and diplomatic costs for violations. For these reasons, international law need to address how states develop and deploy military AI even if enforcement remains imperfect. Read Less