A requirement for tech companies to have ethical review boards when creating and releasing new products could potentially be a great way to regulate the vast amounts of materials they use for, …Read MoreA requirement for tech companies to have ethical review boards when creating and releasing new products could potentially be a great way to regulate the vast amounts of materials they use for products, but also help with overconsumption. Companies such as Apple release new iPhones each year, and we have to ask ourselves if that is truly necessary. An ethical board shows a commitment to social responsibility, which focuses on ethical principles such as reducing harm and sustainability.Read Less
Yes, I do think that there should be a requirement for technology companies to have ethical review boards for new products. Review boards could assess potential issues before the products are launched …Read MoreYes, I do think that there should be a requirement for technology companies to have ethical review boards for new products. Review boards could assess potential issues before the products are launched and they don’t have a negative impact on society. While some may argue that such board could slow innovation, but the long term benefits like consumer trust and transparency outweigh the cons.Read Less
No, I do not think technology companies should be required to have ethical review boards before launching new products. Ethical concerns often emerge after a product is introduced, not before. It is …Read MoreNo, I do not think technology companies should be required to have ethical review boards before launching new products. Ethical concerns often emerge after a product is introduced, not before. It is more practical to respond to actual problems once they appear rather than restricting innovation in advance. Moreover, the concept of “ethics” itself is abstract and subjective (what is considered ethical can vary widely across cultures and contexts. Imposing such standards too early could suppress creativity and slow technological progress. Therefore, ethical issues should be addressed through post-implementation review and regulation, not as a pre-launch requirement.Read Less
Yes, I absolutely agree that there should be a requirement for technology companies’ to have ethical review boards for new products to ensure that digital sovereignty, peoples privacy, ethical …Read MoreYes, I absolutely agree that there should be a requirement for technology companies’ to have ethical review boards for new products to ensure that digital sovereignty, peoples privacy, ethical boundaries, and long-term societal impacts are considered before release. Implementing a review board will help companies evaluate/anticipate the consequences of their technology, which will hopefully promote accountability and and transparency during the development and release process of these companies’ products.Read Less
Yes, a requirement would be beneficial because it will ensure new products don’t harm people and are ethical for production. This would be best to be reviewed by a board of people.
No. The real issue is not wether technology companies should establish formal ethics review boards, but wether the research and development process itself remains neutral and independent from, …Read MoreNo. The real issue is not wether technology companies should establish formal ethics review boards, but wether the research and development process itself remains neutral and independent from political, economic or ideological influenc. Ethical governance should aim to prevent voluntary alignment with state power or commercial interests tht might compromise scientific objectivity.
Rather than imposing additional bureaucratic layers of “review,” the priority should be to cultivate ethical literacy and personal resoponsibility among engineers and researchers, ensuring they can critially evaluate their societal impact. A real ethical integrity arises from a professional culture of transparency, not from committees that can be politicized or utilized as symbolic complicance tools.
However, certain boundaries must remain non-negotiable. Activities involving terrorism, crimes, or universally recognized moral violations should be addressed swiftly through exisiting legal and institutional mechaniss, not through additional ethical boards. Read Less
A requirement for tech companies to have ethical review boards when creating and releasing new products could potentially be a great way to regulate the vast amounts of materials they use for, …Read MoreA requirement for tech companies to have ethical review boards when creating and releasing new products could potentially be a great way to regulate the vast amounts of materials they use for products, but also help with overconsumption. Companies such as Apple release new iPhones each year, and we have to ask ourselves if that is truly necessary. An ethical board shows a commitment to social responsibility, which focuses on ethical principles such as reducing harm and sustainability. Read Less
Yes, I do think that there should be a requirement for technology companies to have ethical review boards for new products. Review boards could assess potential issues before the products are launched …Read MoreYes, I do think that there should be a requirement for technology companies to have ethical review boards for new products. Review boards could assess potential issues before the products are launched and they don’t have a negative impact on society. While some may argue that such board could slow innovation, but the long term benefits like consumer trust and transparency outweigh the cons. Read Less
No, I do not think technology companies should be required to have ethical review boards before launching new products. Ethical concerns often emerge after a product is introduced, not before. It is …Read MoreNo, I do not think technology companies should be required to have ethical review boards before launching new products. Ethical concerns often emerge after a product is introduced, not before. It is more practical to respond to actual problems once they appear rather than restricting innovation in advance. Moreover, the concept of “ethics” itself is abstract and subjective (what is considered ethical can vary widely across cultures and contexts. Imposing such standards too early could suppress creativity and slow technological progress. Therefore, ethical issues should be addressed through post-implementation review and regulation, not as a pre-launch requirement. Read Less
Yes, I absolutely agree that there should be a requirement for technology companies’ to have ethical review boards for new products to ensure that digital sovereignty, peoples privacy, ethical …Read MoreYes, I absolutely agree that there should be a requirement for technology companies’ to have ethical review boards for new products to ensure that digital sovereignty, peoples privacy, ethical boundaries, and long-term societal impacts are considered before release. Implementing a review board will help companies evaluate/anticipate the consequences of their technology, which will hopefully promote accountability and and transparency during the development and release process of these companies’ products. Read Less
Yes, a requirement would be beneficial because it will ensure new products don’t harm people and are ethical for production. This would be best to be reviewed by a board of people.
No. The real issue is not wether technology companies should establish formal ethics review boards, but wether the research and development process itself remains neutral and independent from, …Read MoreNo. The real issue is not wether technology companies should establish formal ethics review boards, but wether the research and development process itself remains neutral and independent from political, economic or ideological influenc. Ethical governance should aim to prevent voluntary alignment with state power or commercial interests tht might compromise scientific objectivity.
Rather than imposing additional bureaucratic layers of “review,” the priority should be to cultivate ethical literacy and personal resoponsibility among engineers and researchers, ensuring they can critially evaluate their societal impact. A real ethical integrity arises from a professional culture of transparency, not from committees that can be politicized or utilized as symbolic complicance tools.
However, certain boundaries must remain non-negotiable. Activities involving terrorism, crimes, or universally recognized moral violations should be addressed swiftly through exisiting legal and institutional mechaniss, not through additional ethical boards. Read Less