The answer to this question depends largely on specific situations in my eyes. In general, I prefer to support wildlife habitats and the long-term goals and populations they serve. Unless there is a …Read MoreThe answer to this question depends largely on specific situations in my eyes. In general, I prefer to support wildlife habitats and the long-term goals and populations they serve. Unless there is a pressing human need (which would need a measurable definition), I think the habitat should be protected, but if the pressing need can be proven, then economic development can be given priority.Read Less
I would say yes, it is very important to protect Wildlife Habitats. At least in the US, the vast majority of undeveloped land is not wildlife protected, so the little land that fits this designation …Read MoreI would say yes, it is very important to protect Wildlife Habitats. At least in the US, the vast majority of undeveloped land is not wildlife protected, so the little land that fits this designation should be protected.Read Less
Yes, I do believe that wildlife habitats should be protected. There are many reasons why stemming from the fact that these are innocent animals in the wild who should be protected. Also, keeping these …Read MoreYes, I do believe that wildlife habitats should be protected. There are many reasons why stemming from the fact that these are innocent animals in the wild who should be protected. Also, keeping these animals protected promotes long-term environmental stability and biodiversity which is essential for human survival and well being.Read Less
Overall, I believe that it is very important to protect wildlife habitats, even if it means that some economic development is temporarily limited. In a way, I view preserving these habitats as an …Read MoreOverall, I believe that it is very important to protect wildlife habitats, even if it means that some economic development is temporarily limited. In a way, I view preserving these habitats as an economic benefit within itself through things like ecotourism (which relies on a healthy environment).Read Less
Yes, of course. It should be very important to protect wildlife and nature, even if it means preventing large corporations or wealthy individuals from implementing extremely exploitative tactics.
Yes, wildlife habitats should be protected, even if it comes at the cost of economic development. Preserving these ecosystems must be a top priority, particularly in the fight against climate change. …Read MoreYes, wildlife habitats should be protected, even if it comes at the cost of economic development. Preserving these ecosystems must be a top priority, particularly in the fight against climate change. While there may be short-term financial losses, safeguarding natural habitats ultimately leads to long-term benefits, both environmental and economic. Once these ecosystems are destroyed, we lose invaluable biodiversity and natural resources that cannot be replaced.Read Less
The answer to this question depends largely on specific situations in my eyes. In general, I prefer to support wildlife habitats and the long-term goals and populations they serve. Unless there is a …Read MoreThe answer to this question depends largely on specific situations in my eyes. In general, I prefer to support wildlife habitats and the long-term goals and populations they serve. Unless there is a pressing human need (which would need a measurable definition), I think the habitat should be protected, but if the pressing need can be proven, then economic development can be given priority. Read Less
I would say yes, it is very important to protect Wildlife Habitats. At least in the US, the vast majority of undeveloped land is not wildlife protected, so the little land that fits this designation …Read MoreI would say yes, it is very important to protect Wildlife Habitats. At least in the US, the vast majority of undeveloped land is not wildlife protected, so the little land that fits this designation should be protected. Read Less
Yes, I do believe that wildlife habitats should be protected. There are many reasons why stemming from the fact that these are innocent animals in the wild who should be protected. Also, keeping these …Read MoreYes, I do believe that wildlife habitats should be protected. There are many reasons why stemming from the fact that these are innocent animals in the wild who should be protected. Also, keeping these animals protected promotes long-term environmental stability and biodiversity which is essential for human survival and well being. Read Less
Overall, I believe that it is very important to protect wildlife habitats, even if it means that some economic development is temporarily limited. In a way, I view preserving these habitats as an …Read MoreOverall, I believe that it is very important to protect wildlife habitats, even if it means that some economic development is temporarily limited. In a way, I view preserving these habitats as an economic benefit within itself through things like ecotourism (which relies on a healthy environment). Read Less
Yeah I’d say so.
Yes, of course. It should be very important to protect wildlife and nature, even if it means preventing large corporations or wealthy individuals from implementing extremely exploitative tactics.
Yes, wildlife habitats should be protected, even if it comes at the cost of economic development. Preserving these ecosystems must be a top priority, particularly in the fight against climate change. …Read MoreYes, wildlife habitats should be protected, even if it comes at the cost of economic development. Preserving these ecosystems must be a top priority, particularly in the fight against climate change. While there may be short-term financial losses, safeguarding natural habitats ultimately leads to long-term benefits, both environmental and economic. Once these ecosystems are destroyed, we lose invaluable biodiversity and natural resources that cannot be replaced. Read Less