US News World Report Article RatingAustralia Approves Seabed Site Where a Japanese Company Will Store Carbon Pollution
- Bias Rating
-16% Somewhat Left
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-16% Somewhat Left
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Log In
Log in to your account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
34% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
64% : Fossil fuels generate a vast majority of its energy.56% : Detractors say it will slow progress of already off-track global efforts to curb emissions and allow power plants and industrial facilities to continue burning fossil fuels under the promise of capturing the exhaust later. CCS projects are moving ahead: The United States has several in operation and the European Union's first offshore facility opened in September.
54% : Some governments and fossil fuel giants including Exxon Mobil and Shell promote the strategy as a climate solution that buys time for countries and industries to transition to cleaner energy.
54% : Japan says CCS is essential to meet its own climate goals Japan -- one of the world's top polluters -- has ambitious goals to reduce its carbon emissions by 60% by 2035 from the 2013 levels, and by 73% by 2040.
53% : "It enables decarbonization in areas where transitioning to non-fossil fuel alternatives -- such as electrification or the use of hydrogen -- is challenging.
46% : Environmentalists say the ramping up of CCS will prolong the use of heavily polluting fossil fuels.
41% : Critics say it will harm critical habitats and endangered wildlife while promoting a technology that prolongs the use of heavily polluting fossil fuels.
32% : "We see it as a greenwashing tactic that fossil fuel companies are using to green light continued pollution instead of doing the obvious choice of ramping down production and phasing out fossil fuels," said Deng.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
