Liverpool Echo Article RatingBeloved Merseyside zoo with 154 species forced to close forever after 51 years
- Bias Rating
50% Medium Right
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Log In
Log in to your account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
29% Positive
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
49% : Ex-keepers at the zoo, as well as welfare organisations and animal behaviour experts reportedly expressed their disquiet over the zoo's conditions to the publication.41% : Only two zoos received more complaints than Southport. "If we believe that an offence under the relevant welfare legislation is being committed, we will consider a prosecution."
30% : Controversy The Captive Animals Protection Society (CAPS) named Southport Zoo as one of Britain's worst zoos in 2002, and there was a point at which the infamous zoo was picketed every weekend by members of two animal welfare groups vehemently demanding its closure.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
