The HillBrennan to Homan on ICE shooting claims: 'Hard to substantiate some of what you are saying'
- Bias Rating
-50% Medium Left
- Reliability
40% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-50% Medium Left
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Log In
Log in to your account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-18% Negative
- Liberal
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
50% : Homan said ICE officers "had emergency lights.48% : Homan said Araujo and others killed by ICE "would be alive today if they simply complied with, with a vehicle stop by federal law enforcement.
45% : Border Czar Tom Homan on Sunday addressed the fatal shooting involving an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer in Houston with claims that CBS News host Margaret Brennan said were "hard to substantiate.
41% : The border czar said there would be an investigation but justified the fatal action taken by an ICE officer.
34% : Brennan said Araujo thought he was being robbed and not involved in an attempted traffic stop led by ICE officers.
32% : " Brennan said videos of the ICE van chasing Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, an undocumented immigrant, do not provide any indication that the vehicle is from a law enforcement agency.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
