The Epoch Times Article RatingGOP Frontrunners in NH Senate Race Fight for Vulnerable Hassan Seat
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
20% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
-15% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
55% : Discussing the top three issues of his campaign, Bolduc said that he would focus on economics, restoring U.S. prestige on the world stage, and securing the southern border.55% : As a young special forces officer, I was assigned to one of our units on the Southern border.
52% : " Finally, Bolduc said, "I will tackle the Southern border.
50% : I would work with Customs and Border Patrol on the ground, stopping drug and human trafficking coming to the United States.
48% : This track record on border security, Carney said, had hurt New Hampshire residents by allowing for an influx of highly-dangerous fentanyl into the state.
45% : The change has been most pronounced in Hassan's shift in attitude toward border security, Carney said.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
