
Harris's campaign tell-all short on lessons to avoid future Democratic defeat
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
65% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
28% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
-17% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
23% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
52% : Not only did Harris know going in when Election Day would be and that she was largely inheriting a campaign structure from a candidate who was already trailing Trump, but most of her strategic choices, from her reliance on big scripted events to the timing and nature of the media interviews she did eventually give, were an attempt to take advantage of the abbreviated campaign cycle.46% : The 60-year-old Californian (this would fit the definition of a middle-aged person who lives in a blue state) lost all seven battleground states, including Nevada, where Trump had come close but never won before, calling into question her own expertise on swing-state sensibilities.
21% : There was, she said, a "real risk," "with the stakes being so high," "running against someone like Donald Trump, who knows no floor" (but had also just deleted any overt opposition to gay marriage from the GOP platform and has since put together what the New York Times described last month as "Donald Trump's big gay government"), in a close race for president.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.