Harris's campaign tell-all short on lessons to avoid future Democratic defeat

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

52% : Not only did Harris know going in when Election Day would be and that she was largely inheriting a campaign structure from a candidate who was already trailing Trump, but most of her strategic choices, from her reliance on big scripted events to the timing and nature of the media interviews she did eventually give, were an attempt to take advantage of the abbreviated campaign cycle.
46% : The 60-year-old Californian (this would fit the definition of a middle-aged person who lives in a blue state) lost all seven battleground states, including Nevada, where Trump had come close but never won before, calling into question her own expertise on swing-state sensibilities.
21% : There was, she said, a "real risk," "with the stakes being so high," "running against someone like Donald Trump, who knows no floor" (but had also just deleted any overt opposition to gay marriage from the GOP platform and has since put together what the New York Times described last month as "Donald Trump's big gay government"), in a close race for president.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.