How significant are Burnham's remarks on Kremlin interference in Brexit vote? - AOL
- Bias Rating
8% Center
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
8% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Log In
Log in to your account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
16% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
54% : Second that Russian English-language media outlets RT and Sputnik published a large amount of anti-EU and pro-Brexit content, which had a wide reach.53% : The Russia topic came up as part of a wide-ranging interview Burnham gave to The Rest is Politics, excerpts of which were released on Sunday, in which he appeared to suggest he had been given new information about the Brexit vote.
53% : Burnham is due to make a Commons statement on Monday afternoon on Brexit and Europe, where he will also have the opportunity to say if the intelligence agencies have made a fresh assessment about whether there was Kremlin interference in 2016.
52% : The idea that one country, with an interest in weakening the UK and the EU, could have had a decisive influence in a vote of 33.5 million people is debatable.
48% : The third aspect, and the most contentious, were claims that Arron Banks, a donor to the pro-Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage, had links to Russia.
46% : But the EU referendum was also a complex, closely fought campaign in which many points of view were in play.
44% : The difference is significant - if there was a fresh assessment it would run counter to the previous position, established under a succession of Conservative governments in the aftermath of the Brexit vote.
43% : A subsequent investigation by the National Crime Agency into £8m-worth of loans Banks provided to Brexit campaigns run by Farage concluded the money was legitimately his and there was no evidence of wrongdoing.
37% : It was a contentious issue in the second half of the previous decade, but one that had largely been forgotten about as the UK finally adjusted to the reality of leaving the EU.
35% : Andy Burnham unexpectedly reopened an old Brexit debate when he said he had been told after becoming prime minister that Russia had interfered in the 2016 EU referendum.
31% : The prime minister is making a broader argument that Britain needs to reconsider its relationship with the EU, arguing Brexit has not delivered what was promised.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
AOL UK