India got highest number of regressive tax recommendations from IMF: Oxfam

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

58% : It offers mostly progressive tax advice to rich countries, yet its guidance for the rest of the world remains largely regressive.
57% : A regressive tax refers to a uniform taxation system which burdens those in lower income groups more than high earners.
56% : India received the highest number of regressive recommendations, followed by several other countries in the Global South India received the highest number of regressive tax recommendations from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) between 2022 and 2024, according to an analysis by Oxfam.
56% : The analysis found that the United States and Brazil received the most progressive IMF tax advice.
56% : Oxfam urged the IMF to "systematically place inequality at the heart of all fiscal advice", defaulting to revenue-raising policies that enhance the progressivity of national tax systems.
56% : It also asked the Fund to develop a "centralised, user-friendly database" to track and publicise the tax advice provided in Article IV reports.
55% : The report also highlighted several country cases reflecting concerning tax policy advice.
55% : Oxfam's analysis also found that only 10 per cent of the IMF's recommended tax reforms referred to gender inequality, and most of those references amount to just a few sentences.
54% : Oxfam examined 1,049 tax recommendations made by the IMF to 125 countries between 2022 and 2024 and found that only 30 recommendations, or around three per cent, focused on net wealth taxes and the taxation of income from wealth, namely capital gains.
54% : In the Philippines, the IMF called for broadening the value-added tax base by rationalising exemptions, while in Cote d'Ivoire, or the Ivory Coast, it recommended eliminating VAT exemptions and applying statutory VAT rates.
52% : The report said that the IMF's tax advice to South Asia was "by far the most regressive", followed by those suggested for Latin America and the Caribbean and sub-Saharan Africa.
52% : Progressive tax measures like net wealth and capital gains taxes were rarely recommended, and when they were, advice was concentrated in high-income contexts," the report said.
52% : Oxfam said the IMF publicly acknowledges that tax policy is a critical tool for addressing inequality, but it links its tax advice to inequality far more often for high-income countries (34 per cent) than low- and lower-middle-income countries (8 per cent).
52% : The Fund must provide equally progressive tax advice to all members, or admit its commitment to tackling inequality is merely rhetorical," Donald said.
52% : More than 90 per cent of the IMF's tax guidance focused on tweaking existing measures, it said.
51% : In Chile, with one of the highest levels of income inequality, the IMF advised raising tax rates for low- and middle-income groups while leaving rates on top income brackets untouched.
51% : In New Zealand, the IMF expressed concern that the corporate income tax in the country is "relatively high compared to peer advanced economies" and advised the government to lower it.
51% : The organisation also called on the IMF to 'conduct and publish rigorous distributional impact assessments' of all tax and fiscal advice in its Article IV reports - the IMF's usually annual assessments of member countries' economies and policies -to ensure recommendations do not exacerbate inequality.
50% : The report said 59 per cent of the IMF's tax advice to low- and lower-middle-income countries was regressive, while 52 per cent of its recommendations to high-income countries were progressive.
50% : "A progressive tax system ensures those who have higher income and more wealth pay proportionally more taxes than those who have less.
48% : "This regressive aspect of tax advice for Global South countries means that most measures advised by the IMF are likely to exacerbate inequality in these countries, by placing the bulk of the tax burden on middle- and low-income people while leaving the wealthiest unscathed."
48% : In Nigeria, where nearly one-third of the population lives in poverty (the highest rate in Africa), it suggested increasing value-added tax, while in Hungary, it advised against a windfall profit tax on energy companies.
47% : In contrast, a tax levied in proportion to one's income is termed progressive.
46% : Oxfam further urged the IMF to significantly broaden recommendations for taxing high-net-worth individuals and wealth, while actively supporting measures to curb corporate tax avoidance and harmful competition.
44% : More From This Section Iran war prompted India to change crude formula to fix 3-year inaccuracypremium CBDT urged to issue master circular on legacy tax guidance in new I-T law Consumer durables' Q4 results may show impact of war, March rainfallpremium India's poverty map bends under climate pressure, finds NISER study Coal imports slip 8.5% in Feb amid record stockpiles, firm global prices
42% : It said the fund should discourage over-reliance on consumption taxes and other regressive measures that disproportionately burden low-income households.
40% : In Sweden, it recommended "lowering taxes on deferred capital gains" to address distortions in the housing market.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.