Japan Executes Osaka Arson Murderer in First Execution in 14 Months
- Bias Rating
-76% Very Left
- Reliability
30% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-76% Very Left
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Log In
Log in to your account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-44% Negative
- Liberal
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
43% : Takami replied, "It is only natural that I receive the death penalty.40% : First under Takaiichi administration; Takami Sunao killed five in 2009 Osaka pachinko parlor arson Japan's Ministry of Justice executed the death penalty on August 21 for a man convicted of arson and murder at a pachinko parlor in Osaka.
40% : The ministry announced that Takami Sunao, 58, a death row inmate who killed five people by pouring gasoline and setting fire to a pachinko parlor in Osaka in 2009, was executed.
28% : The Japanese government justifies executions by citing public opinion, with over 80% supporting the death penalty, making Japan and the U.S. the only G7 nations to retain capital punishment.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
