Lead petitioner in Trump Colorado ballot case says the U.S Supreme Court ruling was based on fear not facts

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

67% : Trump said it's a "big win for America.
55% : While it is a big win for Trump, it's just the beginning of his legal troubles.
45% : "States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office," the majority wrote, "but they have no power to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the presidency.
39% : And while Trump could pardon himself on federal charges, two of the cases are based on state charges.
33% : But on the main point of whether Colorado can kick Trump off the ballot -- the justices unanimously agreed.
31% : " RELATED: Supreme Court says Trump can appear on 2024 ballot, overturning Colorado ruling The lead petitioner, 91-year-old Norma Anderson -- a former Republican state senator -- accused the court of making a decision based on fear not facts: "They don't deserve to sit on that bench if they can't have courage.
26% : The high court's decision shuts the door on dozens of similar challenges to Trump's eligibility and is a stinging rebuke of the Colorado Supreme Court, which said Trump couldn't run for president because he'd engaged in an insurrection.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.