
Marco Rubio plans to cut programs, close offices in State Department overhaul
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
40% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
38% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
-17% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
22% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
49% : The reorganization would also solidify the Trump administration's plans to eliminate the U.S. Agency for International Development and put its functions under direct control of the State Department.45% : That proposal would have shut down embassies across Africa, closed the bureau that liaises with the United Nations and cut diplomatic operations in Canada, among other places.
39% : With oversight from Elon Musk's cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency, USAID had largely been shut down and its staff dismissed.
37% : He also channeled rhetoric used by President Donald Trump, saying the department had created a system that had become "beholden to radical political ideology.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.