Zero Hedge Article RatingMeet Britain's New Cabinet Of Fakers, Fraudsters And Hangers-On
- Bias Rating
28% Somewhat Right
- Reliability
55% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
28% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Log In
Log in to your account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
15% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
63% : Burnham is an out-and-proud socialist who had already signaled that his government would spend and tax more.62% : And look how border security improved.
55% : The new justice secretary is Alex Norris, who spent a year as minister for border security.
54% : Like Burnham, many hark back to a mythical golden age of socialism in the 1970s.
51% : even though she was the minister administering the tax.
50% : Remember that Starmer increased spending on welfare and benefits, after backbenchers rejected his proposal to cut them.
50% : By Tuesday, his administration revealed plans to cut VAT (a sales tax) on electricity, to be funded by cutting the Starmer administration's planned digital ID.
48% : The backbenches are full of untested socialists who think closer to Burnham on public ownership.
45% : In any case, scrapping VAT on electricity doesn't make much difference to a household electricity bill in which most of the pricing goes to fund green initiatives, debt, stealth taxes, and administration.
45% : Stephen is the exemplar to end with - the exemplar of the terminal mess the Labour Party has got itself into: * inherited glory within a party that rails against privilege; * failed politicians lauded as greats; * doubling down on an unadmitted socialism that has already been rejected by the public multiple times, across nearly half a century; * the appointment of professional politicians to roles for which they have few non-political qualifications; * the promotion of ministers based on political ideologies and loyalties rather than functional merits; and * the retention of incumbents for short-term political purposes, to the neglect of long-term stability.
42% : She tars normative Britons as racists (whites and Jews in particular: isn't that racist?), campaigned against Israel, played up her status as the first Muslim home secretary, promised that her promotion would serve "her" community, and railed against supposedly routine experiences of racism in her hometown of Birmingham, where her demographic is the largest.
42% : And since Burnham is committed to the so-called triple lock on pensions and to increasing welfare (he talks about social care as the neglected component, but he's not talking about cutting anything), McFadden has no obvious options except to increase spending.
42% : Angela Rayner is back as housing, communities, and local government secretary, having resigned from the same role when she failed to pay a tax ("stamp duty") on her third house.
41% : He will need to cut other departments or raise taxes (probably both).
36% : He had quit as defense secretary six weeks ago, over Starmer's procrastination on filling a hole in defense spending.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
