Moms, dads can share 4-months 'maternity' leave, ConCourt rules
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
55% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
30% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
8% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
51% : In the High Court, Gauteng Deputy Judge President Roland Sutherland found that the BCEA - as well as the corresponding sections of the Unemployment Insurance Fund (UIF) Act - did not align with the rights to dignity and equality and unfairly discriminated between mothers and fathers.51% : ALSO READ | Ramaphosa hails 30 years of the Constitutional Court in world with human rights under threat The apex court did however order that the minister of labour and employment provide a report "as to whether remedial legislation in respect of the BCEA and the UIF Act has been brought into operation" by no later than six months before the 36-month deadline was up.
44% : * In 2023, the High Court found that the UIF Act and the Basic Conditions of Employment Act were inconsistent with the Constitution and therefore invalid.
40% : It, however, declined to effect a similar reading-in in the UIF Act, saying it did "not have sufficient information at its disposal regarding how the benefits in the corresponding provisions of the UIF Act are calculated" and that it was "preferable for the law-maker to decide the extent of UIF benefits to be conferred on employed parents in a non-discriminatory manner".
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
news24